Donald Trump made it fairly clear earlier than he received the US presidential election that certainly one of his priorities was going to be ending the warfare in Ukraine – and rapidly.
Over the previous couple of days, we have heard an terrible lot of research and opinion in regards to the nature of the talks – folks can have totally different opinions on the compromises which may have to be made with a purpose to cease the preventing, and one of the simplest ways of making certain a peace that lasts.
In journalism, it is necessary to mirror either side of an argument, hear, perceive nuance, totally different views, pay attention to your personal bias.
However it’s additionally necessary to state information – and name out issues that are not true.
Politics latest – Lammy urged to call out Trump attack on Zelenskyy
On Tuesday evening, Donald Trump mentioned Ukraine “ought to by no means have began” the warfare with Russia.
That’s not true – and it ought to be referred to as out.
On 24 February 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine. Its military attacked from Belarus, Russia, and Crimea – which they’ve beforehand annexed.
Did Trump blame Ukraine for warfare?
So what is going on on? Effectively, in response to Boris Johnson, Europeans ought to “cease being scandalised” by Donald Trump.
“Trump’s statements will not be supposed to be traditionally correct however to shock Europeans into motion,” he mentioned.
Learn extra:
Trump’s diplomacy does not look good for Ukraine
Trump ‘disappointed’ by Ukraine’s reaction to talks
Is that this all a negotiating tactic from the US president? It is definitely potential – and a few would agree that Europe must step up.
However regardless of all that, information matter – and this one issues greater than most.
It appears to me, if you happen to’re making an attempt to finish a warfare, you must resist the reality of the way it began.
