A Submit Workplace Seize sufferer says delays within the justice system have left him fearing he might by no means reside to see his title cleared.
Steve Marston was convicted in 1998 of stealing practically £80,000 from his department, based mostly on defective pc software program referred to as Seize that pre-dated the infamous Horizon scandal.
His case has been with the Prison Instances Overview Fee (CCRC) for practically a yr, however has nonetheless not been referred to the Courtroom of Attraction.
‘Sleeping is not simple’
Mr Marston, who turns 70 in February, informed Sky Information: “This ready is simply insufferable… the possibilities of us all (the victims) being there on the endgame are, properly, I might say fairly slim to be sincere.”
“The very last thing I need to do is to not be right here when it is sorted out,” he mentioned.
“I am praying mine will get sorted whereas I am nonetheless right here to get pleasure from the good thing about it.
“You by no means know what is going on to occur tomorrow.”
He describes ready for the CCRC to decide on his case as “soul destroying”.
“On daily basis you are serious about it, speaking about it,” he mentioned.
“You have at all times received a everlasting knot within the abdomen. Sleeping is not precisely simple.”
The CCRC introduced in July that the case of the late Pat Owen, a sub-postmistress convicted in 1998, could be referred to the Courtroom of Attraction.
On Thursday, her case was formally sent to the court – three months after the choice was made to refer.
‘Particular decision wanted’
It comes after a Sky Information investigation found a long-lost damning report referring to the Owen case, which proved Post Office lawyers knew about Capture errors.
The victims’ lawyer, Neil Hudgell, says there’s “no finish in sight” for Submit Workplace Seize victims convicted three many years in the past, as timelines on the CCRC “maintain getting shifted backwards”.
He needs to see a “particular decision” for Seize instances to “shorten the method”.
“I feel these instances should be handled in distinctive circumstances,” he mentioned.
“You have a cohort of very aged individuals who have had a conviction hanging over them for the most effective a part of three many years now and people circumstances are such that I feel that they want a particular decision to them.”
Mr Hudgell believes extending the government’s mass exoneration legislation – which at present applies solely to Horizon victims – may provide a sooner answer.
“You are speaking a couple of fraction of the variety of folks,” he mentioned. “It could be an expeditious repair. However it wants political will.”
Learn extra from Sky Information:
Minister pushed on Horizon
Scandal compensation shake-up
Post Office overhaul plans
Chair of the CCRC Dame Vera Baird, who has been tasked with finishing up a “thorough evaluate” of the organisation, informed Sky Information that Seize instances are being given “what precedence we may give them”.
She described the principle subject with instances as the truth that for many there’s a “actual dearth of data” with paperwork proof not accessible.
Dame Vera added that workers members, nonetheless, will “dig and dig and dig to seek out what we are able to”.
A particular group of case evaluate managers has additionally been set as much as take care of Seize instances with “skilled commissioners able to go when instances come by.”
Dame Vera mentioned the CCRC extra broadly is “fairly short-staffed” and employees have instances of “about 30 or extra”, however they’re recruiting.
She additionally informed Sky Information the CCRC had put in a particular request to “speed up” the Owen case by the Courtroom of Attraction.
“As soon as we have referred,” she mentioned, “we do ask, the place there’s anyone who’s not very properly maybe or anyone who’s older, we attempt to speed up it and the Courtroom of Appeals is sweet they are going to speed up it on our request nearly at all times.”
A Submit Workplace spokesperson mentioned: “We proceed to completely co-operate with the CCRC by supplying paperwork and knowledge, the place that is accessible, that has been requested in relation to pre-Horizon convictions.
“While we will not touch upon particular person instances, we proceed to assist the CCRC in coping with pre-Horizon convictions.”












