Is historical past about to repeat itself, 50 years after the final time a Labour chancellor raised the essential price of revenue tax?
Now that Rachel Reeves has dumped Labour’s election pledge to not improve nationwide insurance coverage, revenue tax or VAT, she’s tipped to boost revenue tax by 2p on 26 November.
Politics Hub: Latest updates and analysis
Again in 1975, Labour’s chancellor, the previous bruiser Denis Healey, did simply that, although again then the essential price of revenue tax was 33%, and he elevated it to 35%.
Loads of parallels…
It is claimed there are similarities between the state of UK politics and the economic system in 1975 and at present. Labour had gained a normal election the yr earlier than, for example.
Healey claimed he’d inherited an economic system in a large number from Edward Heath’s Conservative authorities. Sound acquainted?
His spending cuts had been seen as a U-turn and triggered an indignant backlash from left-wing Labour MPs. Sound acquainted?
In 1975, the Conservatives had a brand new chief – a girl, for the primary time – in Margaret Thatcher, who even her supporters admit, struggled in her first yr. Sound acquainted?
Within the 70s, Healey introduced he was reviewing the choices for a wealth tax, simply as Reeves has been urged to, by former Labour chief Neil Kinnock and union leaders.
And simply because the Tories declare larger taxes will set off a mind drain in 2025, Mick Jagger and the Rolling Stones had left for France in 1971 and David Bowie moved to Switzerland in 1976.
A phrase typically attributed to Healey was that he wished to “squeeze the wealthy till the pips squeak”. In actual fact, what he mentioned, in 1974, was that he “wished to squeeze property speculators till the pips squeak”.
…but it surely may very well be worse!
However earlier than we get too depressed about 26 November, the economic system was in a a lot worse state within the Nineteen Seventies, with inflation heading in the direction of 25%, unemployment rising and the pound falling. It was known as “stagflation”.
Again then, the world was reeling from a world disaster created by a large rise in oil costs, although a public sector spending spree, with big pay settlements gained by the unions, did not assist.
“The funds I’ve offered at present is a tough one for all of us in Britain,” Healey concluded on the finish of his horror funds. “It’s dictated by the tough actuality of the world we stay in.
“A extreme funds is a vital component in any technique for enhancing the general efficiency of our economic system, which has been lagging more and more behind most industrial economies for greater than a single era.”
Responding, the brand new Tory chief on the time, Margaret Thatcher, taunted overseas secretary James Callaghan for “muttering away” and concluded: “I bear in mind him making a funds speech during which he summed up his funds as, ‘regular as she goes’.
“The current chancellor of the exchequer gave the impression to be saying that this one was, ‘regular as she sinks’.” Properly, humour wasn’t her strongest swimsuit.
As of late inflation is a mere 3.8%, though that is almost double the Financial institution of England’s 2% goal, because the shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride identified after the newest figures.
“Mixed together with her £25bn jobs tax, Rachel Reeves is pushing inflation larger and better,” Sir Mel declared. “Starmer and Reeves don’t have the spine to kind this mess out.”
Learn extra: What taxes could Reeves raise?
Sir Keir Starmer spelt out the place he claims the blame lies for “robust however truthful choices” in 2025 when he addressed Labour MPs – reported to be “grim-faced” as they listened – on Monday night.
“It is turning into clearer that the long-term impression of Tory austerity, their botched Brexit deal and the pandemic on Britain’s productiveness is worse than even we feared,” he mentioned.
Ah sure, Tory austerity, Brexit, and the pandemic, they’re what has induced the £20bn (or is it £30bn?) black gap within the public funds, in response to the PM.
Does historical past inform us what may occur subsequent?
Healey’s budgets did not finish nicely for Labour. He was compelled to go cap in hand to the Worldwide Financial Fund for a bail-out in 1976 and Labour misplaced the 1979 normal election to Thatcher.
May one thing comparable occur once more? At the least the 1974-79 Harold Wilson-James Callaghan went full-term, regardless that Callaghan was compelled right into a Lib-Lab pact to outlive.
This week Nigel Farage predicted the Starmer authorities will solely final two extra years. Wishful pondering, little doubt, as he basks in a wholesome opinion ballot lead.
“My view is that in two budgets’ time the markets will really pressure the chancellor into what can be a real austerity funds, at which level the left within the Labour Social gathering will not purchase it,” he mentioned.
“And it is why I nonetheless stand by my prediction that there can be a normal election, brought on by financial collapse that may occur in 2027.”
In his 15 April funds in 1975, Healey did not simply elevate the essential price of revenue tax. Different charges went up by two proportion factors as nicely. Solely the highest 83% price – sure, 83%! – was left unchanged.
In his first funds, in March 1974, Healey had raised the essential price of revenue tax charges from 30% to 33%, a brand new tax band at 38% was launched, and the highest price elevated from 75% to 83%.
Extra was to return in 1975. In addition to the rise within the primary revenue tax price, a 25% price of VAT was utilized to “luxurious items”, comparable to electrical home equipment, cameras and jewelry, rather than the essential price of 8%.
Obligation on bingo – massively in style within the 70s – doubled to five%, meals subsidies had been minimize, including 0.5p to the price of a loaf, and beer went up by 2p, wine by 24p and spirits by 64p.
Rachel Reeves’ funds on 26 November could not presumably be that painful, absolutely?
May it?













