Heading into the second 12 months of Trump 2.0, on the subject of science, some argue Trump has no constant ideology for decision-making. Others argue the unifying theme is destruction of science itself.
SCOTT DETROW, HOST:
This week marks one 12 months of Trump 2.0. The president’s guiding ideas within the second tour of the White Home have gotten clear in areas like international coverage and immigration, however what do President Trump’s actions reveal about his views on science? Trying again to 2025, NPR’s Katia Riddle seems at what what we are able to deduce about his guiding ideology on science coverage.
KATIA RIDDLE, HOST:
When the Trump administration first took workplace a 12 months in the past, it instantly started working to weaken federal companies engaged in science – the Nationwide Science Basis, NASA, the NIH, the CDC. Some libertarians, believing in smaller authorities, thought they’d hit the jackpot.
ROBBY SOAVE: We had a window of pleasure. I used to be like, oh, we really did win. This wager paid off. They will do my issues.
RIDDLE: That is Robby Soave, an editor on the libertarian journal Purpose. He says, on the subject of science and well being coverage, there’s been occasions on this final 12 months when the Trump administration has been singing from the Libertarian hymnal.
SOAVE: There was a motion on the rescheduling of marijuana, which is a large, big coverage concern not only for libertarians.
RIDDLE: Libertarians additionally like Trump’s assertion that People, not the federal government, ought to resolve which vaccines they want.
SOAVE: You recognize, the broader MAHA agenda of RFK Jr. is thrilling to many libertarians.
RIDDLE: However Soave says he and plenty of different libertarians have been disillusioned with Trump for, amongst different issues, his lack of constancy to, quote, “medical freedom ideology.” Take insurance policies round trans individuals, for instance. One of many first issues Trump did was signal an govt order declaring that the U.S. will acknowledge solely two genders.
SOAVE: When it comes to science and medical conduct, the libertarian ethos is, should you’re not harming anybody else, it is your physique. It is best to be capable to do no matter you need.
RIDDLE: Soave notes that concepts about trans well being care are extra controversial amongst libertarians on the subject of minors. He says, whereas different president’s ideologies have assorted, Trump appears to not have one in any respect.
SOAVE: Individuals who have a really coherent or labored out ideological set of views are at all times like, is Trump one among us? Is he towards us? Yeah, that sort of factor. And it is simply – it is – neither is the case.
RIDDLE: Officers from the White Home didn’t reply to requests for touch upon this story. Some who research historic science coverage beneath completely different presidential administrations say they do see a unifying idea of science beneath Trump. Naomi Oreskes is a scientific historian at Harvard.
NAOMI ORESKES: Science is the enemy.
RIDDLE: Oreskes factors to issues the Trump administration has performed, like weakening environmental rules, reducing the federal science workforce, ignoring scientific proof and even misrepresenting proof. She says this isn’t the primary administration to view science as an adversary.
ORESKES: There’s been a department of conservative ideology for a very long time now, going again to the Reagan administration, that has seen science because the enemy as a result of science gives the factual foundation that justifies a variety of environmental regulation.
RIDDLE: Science will get in the best way of revenue, she says. Even Nixon, says Oreskes, famously hated scientists and intellectuals. However there’s a key distinction between Trump and different antiscience presidents like Nixon.
ORESKES: He by no means tried to fireplace scientists, proper? He by no means tried to only unilaterally withdraw grants that had been legally licensed by way of, , the Nationwide Science Basis, the Nationwide Institutes of Well being.
RIDDLE: It is the disregard for legal guidelines and protocol round science, she says, that units this administration aside. Sheila Jasanoff at Harvard research how science, regulation and politics form each other. She’s been learning this discipline since 1978.
SHEILA JASANOFF: That is like getting near half a century. And in that point, I’ve by no means seen a scientific shutting down of areas of inquiry beneath any president.
RIDDLE: Jasanoff says completely different presidents have needed to steer scientific discovery in numerous methods however by no means halting it altogether.
JASANOFF: That’s one thing fairly new in my expertise.
RIDDLE: Freedom of inquiry in science, says Jasanoff, is key to this nation however isn’t basic to Trump’s governing ideology or his relationship to the reality. Katia Riddle, NPR Information.
Copyright © 2026 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts might differ. Transcript textual content could also be revised to appropriate errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its authentic broadcast or publication. The authoritative document of NPR’s programming is the audio document.
