Angela Rayner was “incorrect” to stage a high-profile intervention criticising the course of Sir Keir Starmer’s authorities this week, Harriet Harman has mentioned.
Talking to Sky Information’ political editor Beth Rigby on the Electoral Dysfunction podcast, the veteran Labour peer mentioned Ms Rayner had supplied simply “one criticism after one other” somewhat than “constructive proposals”.
Politics Hub: Follow the latest
“It is really easy to be common when you’re not within the scorching seat, and whoever took over from Starmer would face all the identical issues,” Baroness Harman mentioned.
In a speech at an occasion hosted by marketing campaign group Mainstream on Wednesday, the previous deputy prime minister warned Labour was “working out of time”.
“I am an enormous fan of Angela Rayner. I feel she’s a outstanding girl. I feel she energised the celebration after we have been in opposition increase into authorities,” Baroness Harman mentioned.
Angela Rayner speaks at a summit in Liverpool this week. Pic:Reuters
However talking about Ms Rayner’s speech on Wednesday night, she added: “It did not have any proposals about what must be performed.
“I simply do not suppose she must be doing this. I feel it is incorrect for her and it is definitely incorrect for the celebration and the federal government.
“It is the type of issues which can be mentioned by Nigel Farage, by Kemi Badenoch, by the Greens, by the Lib Dems.
“I feel it is best so that you can come ahead with constructive proposals somewhat than simply criticise a authorities, which is coping with a really troublesome scenario.”
Learn extra:
Labour’s left unit behind ‘major reset’ call
‘Is she saying immigration does not matter?’
Baroness Harman additionally mentioned the previous deputy prime minister mustn’t “wave” immigration “away” as a difficulty.
“The opposite factor that I might take subject with Angela Rayner on that is that immigration is now, should you take a look at the opinion polls and simply pay attention on the doorstep, it is the second most essential subject to folks after the price of residing,” she mentioned.
“To only wave it away as a difficulty and say it is un-British to train further controls… what’s she suggesting as an alternative?
“Is she saying it does not matter that individuals are involved about immigration or that is the incorrect coverage and we must be attempting one thing else?” Baroness Harman mentioned.
“It is only a detrimental intervention.”
