Fujitsu’s European boss has denied that the corporate is “a parasite on the British state” after MPs challenged it over its place on Publish Workplace scandal compensation.
The confrontation got here throughout a parliamentary committee session analyzing the “continued seek for justice and accountability” for victims.
The federal government has put aside £1.8bn for redress for sub‑postmasters wrongly prosecuted resulting from failures in Fujitsu’s Horizon IT system.
The corporate is but to contribute in the direction of compensation regardless of saying it had a “ethical obligation” to, two years in the past.
Paul Patterson, director at Fujitsu Providers Ltd, was additionally questioned by MPs concerning the firm securing public sector contract extensions price an estimated £500m, amid assurances it could not bid for brand spanking new UK authorities work.
Chair of the Enterprise and Commerce Choose Committee of MPs, Liam Byrne, advised the chief: “Your refusal to inform us how a lot Fujitsu can pay right into a £1.8bn invoice for taxpayers leads individuals to the conclusion that frankly Fujitsu is behaving like a parasite on the British state with out an obligation to step as much as its obligations.”
The Fujitsu boss rejected the accusation stating: “We’re not a parasite… the federal government has obtained an possibility as to whether or not they want to lengthen these contracts or not. If you want us to stroll away from these contracts, we’ll stroll away from these contracts,” he stated.
He argued that ending Fujitsu’s authorities work can be “detrimental to society” and insisted the corporate had solely prolonged its Publish Workplace contract as a result of ministers requested it.
The manager pointed to Fujitsu’s 4‑decade presence within the UK, its 5,000 staff and its community of subcontractors, saying the agency remained “a really critical organisation” dedicated to its obligations.
Strain is mounting on the federal government to safe a considerable monetary contribution from Fujitsu, which constructed and maintained the Horizon system on the centre of one of many UK’s largest miscarriages of justice.
In the course of the committee listening to, nevertheless, it grew to become clear that Fujitsu might be ready till the conclusion to the general public inquiry into the scandal, chaired by Sir Wyn Williams, earlier than asserting a selected determine.
Learn extra:
Second Horizon victim ‘forced’ to sue Post Office
Appeal court delay for first Capture case
Mr Patterson additionally stated that Fujitsu must be “knowledgeable by Sir Wyn” including that extra info has come to mild since he final appeared earlier than the committee together with concerning the “Seize system”.
“I did not learn about a Seize system,” he stated, “I did not know there have been victims of that, I did not know there was authorized recommendation in 2013 telling the Publish Workplace what to do or to not.
“That’s the reason Sir Wyn’s recommendation is de facto, actually essential to us and can inform the dedication I’m providing you with once more and that I’ve given to the committee earlier than that we are going to contribute to redress.”
Seize was an accounting system used within the Nineteen Nineties pre‑courting Horizon, which additionally produced unreliable information.
Sky Information has helped expose the size of the scandal by uncovering a protracted‑misplaced doc in a retired professional’s storage.
The session additionally heard from others related to the Publish Workplace scandal, together with victims’ attorneys, who echoed requires larger urgency in delivering redress and justice.
Nigel Railton, chair of the Publish Workplace, stated it was his private opinion that the federal government ought to legislate to exonerate Seize victims, just like Horizon victims.











