The federal government has introduced a brand new definition of anti-Muslim hate that features violence, harassment and prejudicial stereotyping – because it insisted the transfer is not going to curtail free speech.
Ministers say it’s a working definition and a “device for presidency and organisations to higher perceive, measure, stop and deal with anti-Muslim hostility”.
Crucially, the definition is non-statutory – which means it’s advisory and has no authorized backing.
Discrimination of somebody attributable to their faith or perception is already illegal underneath the Equality Act.
Communities Secretary Steve Reed instructed MPs that ministers had an obligation to behave towards document ranges of hate crime towards Muslims, however that “you possibly can’t deal with an issue if you cannot describe it”.
He additionally denied the definition would intervene with freedom of speech or create “blasphemy legal guidelines by the again door”.
Hate crimes towards Muslims reported to police in England and Wales rose by virtually a fifth within the 12 months ending March 2025, to three,199 offences.
The determine doesn’t embrace incidents reported to Metropolitan Police attributable to modifications in its recording system.
Jewish folks confronted the very best price of hate crimes, in line with the federal government figures, with 106 incidents per 10,000 inhabitants. Muslims have been second, with 12 per 10,000 inhabitants.
In February final 12 months, the federal government arrange a working group, led by former Tory minister Dominic Grieve, to give you a definition of anti-Muslim hatred or Islamophobia.
However Sky Information learnt in October that ministers were moving away from the word “Islamophobia” and in the direction of “anti-Muslim hostility”.
Alongside the brand new definition, ministers have set out an accompanying textual content which says freedom of speech and expression are protected by legislation, which incorporates criticising or ridiculing a perception, together with Islam.
“Portraying it in a way that a few of its adherents may discover disrespectful or scandalous,” can be authorized, the textual content says.
Talking within the Commons, shadow communities minister Paul Holmes stated the definition risked “hindering reliable criticism” – which Mr Reed rejected.
“We is not going to do what [the Conservatives] did and stand by and easily watch whereas Muslim communities face focused abuse in ways in which any respectable nation would take into account to be completely insupportable,” he replied.
Mr Reed introduced the brand new definition as he unveiled a wider technique on social cohesion.
The British Muslim Belief welcomed the transfer, with chairman Shabir Randeree saying it might “assist information establishments which have too typically been too gradual or too weak of their responses to incidents a tolerant and respectful nation like ours mustn’t ever settle for”.
The federal government is to additionally appoint a particular consultant on anti-Muslim hostility to have interaction with communities and assist facilitate understanding and implementation of the definition.
Learn extra from Sky Information:
Iran footballers granted humanitarian visas
Musk’s X grilled over ‘appalling’ Grok posts
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer visited a group centre in London on Monday to talk with residents about how the federal government was attempting to guard folks from the impacts of the battle within the Center East.
He stated “we mustn’t let” the battle drive aside communities within the UK, and that Muslim and Jewish communities particularly wanted reassuring.
Mr Reed additionally instructed MPs within the Commons that the federal government was defending Jewish communities with “document funding for safety at synagogues and faculties, hundreds of thousands of kilos to deal with antisemitism in faculties and universities, new legal guidelines to cease abusive protests exterior locations of worship”.
He added: “At the moment, we’re going even additional to deal with antisemitism in faculties and schools and within the healthcare system, and crucially, clamping down laborious on the extremism which so typically targets Jews to start with.”











