Harry Potter’s Slytherin Traits Explained

One underrated side of the “Harry Potter” franchise is that, as a lot as Hogwarts is a magical place that so many youngsters would like to attend, it is also a parody of old school British boarding colleges. There have been (and nonetheless are) loads of these forms of colleges in the actual world, full with a fame for having a privileged, considerably smarmy pupil physique. Within the “Harry Potter” books and films, you may see that stereotypically horrible boarding faculty conduct with the Slytherin home; its college students are portrayed as a bunch of old-money bigots, typically believing (normally appropriately) that they’ll get away with something.

The “Harry Potter” property ups the ante by not simply having the Slytherins be annoying wealthy jerks, however by additionally having the obvious majority of them be supporters of Lord Voldemort, the wizard equal of Adolf Hitler. The Slytherins are so horrible that by the ultimate “Harry Potter” ebook, when the college’s getting ready to battle off Voldemort’s military in a single huge battle, the Slytherin college students refuse to hitch in. Those that do keep accomplish that on Voldemort’s behalf, not the college’s.

So, how’d this occur? No one anticipated the Wizarding World to be excellent, however absolutely it wasn’t to this point gone that its central wizarding faculty would foster an brazenly evil home of scholars for generations on finish. Are the Slytherins actually this horrible? Or is there an unreliable narrator state of affairs happening right here?

Within the first “Harry Potter” ebook, readers are handled to a music from the Sorting Hat describing all the homes at Hogwarts. The hat takes up a charitable tone in its varied descriptions, but it surely’s instantly clear that one among these homes is just not just like the others. “In Slytherin, you will make your actual associates,” the Sorting Hat says, “These crafty people use any means to attain their ends.”

This is not actually a praise, although, is it? All through the books, essentially the most constructive trait ascribed to Slytherins is that they are “formidable,” regardless that that is an adjective that is impartial at greatest. Gryffindors are described as being courageous, Ravenclaws as good, and Hufflepuffs as type and dependable; describing Slytherin as “crafty” and “formidable” certain looks as if a crimson flag as compared. It does not even seem like true, both. Have Slytherin college students like Crabbe or Goyle ever come throughout as formidable to anybody?

The opposite key trait of a Slytherin pupil is that they’ve pure blood, which implies each their dad and mom are from wizard households. Though muggle-born college students do supposedly find yourself in Slytherin now and again, it is a uncommon incidence, particularly since quite a lot of Slytherins (notably Harry’s rival Draco Malfoy) present a transparent disdain towards their muggle-born friends. There’s even a slur for them (“mudbloods”) that solely Slytherins appear to take pleasure in throwing round. And whereas being a racist is not thought-about a key trait of being Slytherin (the Sorting Hat definitely by no means mentions it), it certianly seem like a significant unofficial attribute.

Along with being power-hungry and racist, the most important PR loss for Slytherin all through the “Harry Potter” franchise is that the dark wizard who killed Harry’s parents, Voldemort himself, was as soon as a Slytherin pupil. Most of Voldemort’s followers are Slytherins too, and lots of the named Slytherin college students we meet all through the property have dad and mom who’re dedicated to the Darkish Lord’s trigger.

Draco, essentially the most distinguished Slytherin pupil, is even the son of one among Voldemort’s most distinguished followers. Many of the “Harry Potter” books and films depict him in an unflattering gentle as nicely, whether or not he is reveling in his fellow college students being terrorized by a mysterious creature or laughing as Voldemort’s followers torment a poor muggle household. He is finally given some depth in “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince,” however all through the 5 books and movies main as much as that, he is the embodiment of each horrible stereotype individuals imagine about his home.

The opposite distinguished Slytherin character within the franchise is Severus Snape, the potions professor who spends the primary six books and films bullying a bunch of children every day. Snape is eventually revealed to be working for the side of good, however that does not fairly clarify why he is so horrible to so lots of his college students. Even outdoors his abuse of kids, we see in flashbacks that he was a religious follower of Voldemort; he did not change sides as a result of he discovered an ethical spine, however as a result of Voldemort killed Harry’s mom Lily, the supply of Snape’s unrequited love. If Voldemort had murdered another poor lady in Lily’s place, it is unlikely Snape would’ve cared.

In as we speak’s digital age, the obvious real-life parallel to the Slytherin home are the net echo chambers that throw individuals down alt-right pipelines. Hogwarts’ home system is throwing all of the dangerous youngsters right into a single home, socially isolating them from any of the nice youngsters who may problem their worldviews or encourage them to be higher. Not solely that, however the Slytherin youngsters who aren’t racist or evil additionally seem like rapidly pushed in that course by the Slytherins who’re.

It looks as if the good selection for Hogwarts, particularly after Voldemort returned for one more reign of terror, could be to disband the Slytherin home and disperse their college students into the opposite three homes. As a substitute of being surrounded by the college’s most evil college students, the would-be Slytherins would as a substitute be surrounded by a wholesome mixture of character varieties. This is able to each assist these college students develop and mature, and it will erase many of the dangerous vibes across the faculty.

Sadly, there are structural causes for why this does not occur in any of the books or films. The Slytherins are the richest home at Hogwarts and so they appear to have no scarcity of highly effective households related to the Ministry; to disband the home, you’d should get by way of them first. Then there’s the entire concern of the Wizarding World being remarkably complacent. Even Hogwarts’ headmaster Dumbledore, the closest factor the “Harry Potter” franchise has to a transparent voice-of-reason character, is snug with the fixed dysfunction happening at his faculty. He is keen to query the college’s sorting system — musing at one level that maybe Hogwarts kinds the youngsters too early — however he by no means goes so far as to query whether or not Slytherin ought to even exist in any respect.

The characters in these tales appear largely unable to think about a greater world for themselves or significantly rethink the constructions of their present society. Out of all of the characters, solely Harry’s pal Hermione seeks to change things radically for the better, and that does not precisely go nicely for her.

“They are not all dangerous,” as “Harry Potter” creator JK Rowling defined in a 2008 interview with PotterCast. “And, nicely, removed from it. As we all know, on the finish, they might have [laughs] a barely extra extremely developed sense of self-preservation than different individuals. […] It is the previous saying, ‘There isn’t any reality, there are solely factors of view.”

In the identical interview, she clarified that a few of the Slytherins had truly returned for the battle at Hogwarts; they’d merely left to get reinforcements after which come again to assist. Nonetheless, there isn’t any point out of this within the last “Harry Potter” ebook and definitely no point out of it within the film adaptation. It does not assist the Slytherins’ case that essentially the most heroic factor they’ve ever performed was one thing solely ever talked about offhand by the franchise’s creator in an interview. Should you subscribe to the entire “Dying of the Creator” idea of media criticism (which is pretty much a necessity for modern “Harry Potter” fans), then this rationalization does not maintain a lot weight.

The clearest little bit of proof that Rowling did not intend for the Slytherins to be evil is with the character of Professor Slughorn, who’s launched within the sixth ebook as the college’s new potions professor. Slughorn is a coward, an elitist, and he maintain some informal prejudice in the direction of muggle-born college students, however to his credit score, he does battle Voldemort’s forces within the last battle at Hogwarts and by no means as soon as appears sympathetic to Voldemort’s ideology. There are additionally some minor Slytherin characters who’re sometimes implied to dislike Malfoy or Voldemort, though none of them are fleshed out sufficient to make any impression.

If there’s one profit to the controversial “Harry Potter” TV series reboot, it is that its medium will provide the sequence the prospect to flesh out all these Slytherin college students. Perhaps the TV model of Draco will probably be barely much less of an evil brat for his first 5 years of college, and possibly Snape will not be, say, casually threatening to homicide college students’ pets. Maybe we’ll even get to see a couple of Slytherins befriend Harry and the gang in some unspecified time in the future or flip up on the battle at Hogwarts (assuming the present lasts that lengthy).

Of the primary Slytherin characters, Draco’s undoubtedly bought essentially the most room for enchancment right here. He is a personality who looks as if he is getting a redemption arc within the last two books (or last three films), however followers needed to accept half of 1. By the tip of the story, Draco certain appears disillusioned with Voldemort’s deal, however he nonetheless does not do a lot to make up for a complete childhood of being absolutely the worst. Maybe there’s a chance right here for the books to flesh Draco out somewhat sooner than his “Half-Blood Prince” arc; possibly he grows extra difficult as early as seasons 4 or 5, in order that when season 7 comes alongside, we are able to extra simply purchase a extra triumphant, redemptive conclusion (once more, within the occasion the sequence reaches that time).

It is also potential that the present will double down on the Slytherins being terrible and use that as a justification to dismantle the home on the finish of the ultimate season. After over 25 years of the “Harry Potter” franchise ignoring the elephant within the room, maybe that is the time for it to take a stand and say that Slytherin has to go. Both the TV present could make the Slytherins extra nuanced or it may possibly dismantle their home fully; each might be compelling instructions for the sequence to take. It is solely the middle-of-the-road, standing quo-affirming strategy that might be a real disappointment. The TV reboot has the prospect to shake issues up a bit, so let’s hope it takes benefit.