J.K. Rowling Faces Backlash After Saying ‘There Are No Trans Kids’

J.K. Rowling is going through backlash for her controversial views on transgender points, together with latest claims that “there aren’t any trans youngsters.”

Attributable to her remarks, the writer has discovered herself on the heart of one other social media storm months after being slammed for her remarks about boxer Imane Khelife.

Regardless of J.Okay. Rowling’s remarks, HBO has defended her position within the upcoming “Harry Potter” collection, stating that her artistic enter is invaluable.

Rowling has confronted backlash lately for her outspoken views on gender and ladies’s rights, and now the “Harry Potter” writer has as soon as once more sparked controversy along with her latest remarks, asserting that “there aren’t any trans youngsters” and dismissing the concept people might be born within the fallacious physique.

In a put up on X, Rowling responded to a critic accusing her of “hateful deal with trans youngsters,” writing: “There aren’t any trans youngsters. No little one is ‘born within the fallacious physique.'”

She doubled down: “There are solely adults such as you, ready to sacrifice the well being of minors to bolster your perception in an ideology that can find yourself wreaking extra hurt than lobotomies and false reminiscence syndrome mixed.”

Rowling’s assertion triggered a wave of reactions from throughout X (previously Twitter).

Supporters thanked the writer for defending what they noticed because the well-being of youngsters, with one person writing: “‘Thanks for being a robust voice in defending youngsters.”

One other commented, “Thanks for utilizing your voice and recognition to convey gentle to fact and rescue youngsters from life-altering errors.”

Nevertheless, not everybody agreed with Rowling’s assertion, as a number of on the social media platform criticized her stance.

One critic sarcastically questioned her authority on the topic, commenting, “You are additionally a medical knowledgeable. Did not know that. This factor that everybody well-known for something feels the urge to behave as an knowledgeable of one thing else… makes me loopy!”

One other individual famous: “Did not understand my companion would not exist! i suppose she by no means was a trans child like, critically. What do you say to the many individuals who transitioned youthful and live joyful lives now ?”

Another individual mentioned, “I recall listening to Margaret Thatcher say this very factor again within the late 80s about gays and lesbians. What a means to make use of your voice and platform. Have you ever ever thought-about really caring about ladies? You have aligned your self with a few of the worst misogynists as a substitute. Unconscionable”

Earlier this yr, Rowling shared that former colleagues who had distanced themselves from her in public resulting from her views on transgender points privately reached out to “test they have been nonetheless buddies.”

The writer has been vocal about her opposition to phrases like “individuals who menstruate,” describing such phrases and phrases as “cis” as rooted in ideology.

Regardless of her controversial stance, Rowling had earlier maintained that she helps the transgender neighborhood. Based on the Every day Mail, In June 2020, she revealed that she “cherished trans folks” however famous that “erasing the idea of intercourse removes the flexibility of many to meaningfully talk about their lives.”

Nevertheless, ever since, Rowling has solely grow to be an increasing number of vital of Trans folks and gender-affirming surgical procedures.

In August this yr, she sparked fury on-line after commenting on Algerian boxer Imane Khelife, who participated within the ladies’s 66 kg (welterweight) boxing occasion on the 2024 Olympics and gained the gold medal.

Rowling caught flack after calling the boxer, who had been beforehand disqualified from one other competitors for not assembly gender eligibility guidelines, a “male who is aware of he is protected by a misogynist sporting institution.”

Khelife has since filed a lawsuit with French authorities, by which she named Rowling and Elon Musk for his or her alleged “acts of aggravated cyber harassment.”

Final month, HBO stood by Rowling after she confronted intense criticism over her views on transgender points.

The community obtained many complaints about Rowling’s position as government producer of the upcoming “Harry Potter” TV collection.

In a press release to Selection, the community responded: “We’re proud to as soon as once more inform the story of ‘Harry Potter’ – the heartwarming books that talk to the ability of friendship, resolve and acceptance. JK Rowling has a proper to specific her private views. We are going to stay centered on the event of the brand new collection, which is able to solely profit from her involvement.”

Regardless of HBO’s protection, the mission has drawn blended reactions. Some followers criticized the difference as “pointless,” whereas others threatened to boycott the collection over Rowling’s controversial remarks.

In an interview with Newsweek, Evan Nierman, CEO of PR agency Purple Banyan, mentioned the worth of Warner Bros. Discovery, the father or mother firm of HBO, supporting Rowling.

He famous, “By publicly supporting J.Okay. Rowling, Warner Bros. is investing in a colossally artistic and profitable writer, versus taking a public stance on the controversial transgender subject.”

In the meantime, cultural analyst and author Areej Shaikh prompt that whereas Warner Bros. Discovery’s (WBD) help of Rowling might mirror a shift in how corporations strategy cancel tradition, it would not signify a victory for Rowling within the broader cultural debate.

“This choice signifies a change towards extra publicly endorsing contentious personalities when their artistic affect is valued, nevertheless it doesn’t essentially imply Rowling has ‘gained’ the cultural struggle,” she mentioned.

Shaikh additionally famous that the studio “appears to be placing the ‘Harry Potter’ franchise’s cultural and monetary historical past forward of the divisive controversy” plaguing Rowling.

“This technique implies that as a substitute of adopting clear-cut positions, companies might now be navigating cancel tradition with a better emphasis on hanging a stability between public opinion and artistic contribution,” the analyst concluded.