A famend pharmacologist and knowledgeable witness within the Primodos drug scandal has been unmasked as a fraud – by his daughter.
Professor Michael Briggs, who was additionally a NASA scientist and adviser to the World Well being Organisation, constructed his glittering profession on lies by faking his {qualifications}.
The revelations are available in a brand new ebook known as The Scientist Who Wasn’t There, written by his daughter Joanne Briggs – and Sky Information can now reveal how his story sheds new mild on a medical scandal that has rumbled on for 5 a long time.
From 1966 to 1970, Professor Briggs was UK analysis director for Schering prescription drugs, which made the being pregnant check drug Primodos, offered within the UK with nice business success.
Joanne Briggs has unmasked her father’s lies
Later, lots of of moms would declare that the drug broken their infants within the womb – and Briggs was known as as an knowledgeable witness to problem their case.
His involvement in understanding the consequences of Primodos runs from the Sixties to the present day, and questions stay over whether or not his analysis was amongst a more moderen physique of labor which has been utilized by the federal government to justify not establishing a redress scheme for disabled claimants.
But, Briggs was a person who faked analysis.
“After I was small, I believed my dad to be the one man who knew all science,” Joanne Briggs writes.
The son of a typewriter mechanic from Manchester, he was an enigmatic determine, usually wearing a blazer and sun shades. In a single previous household picture, Joanne says he appears like “an operative from MI5, after he’d been issued with a spouse and baby”.
Professor Briggs claimed he had suggested movie director Stanley Kubrick on the making of 2001: A House Odyssey.
He had certainly labored for NASA on the Mars probe, primarily based on the California Institute of Expertise, although Joanne believes he used “a three-card trick” to get the job.
Chatting with Sky Information in her kitchen in Sussex, she pulls out two A4-bound books.
One purports to be a PhD thesis from Cornell College in 1959 by MH Briggs. The opposite is a Physician of Science diploma dated 1961 from Wellington College in New Zealand.
“Each of those paperwork are sadly fakes,” says Joanne, explaining that her father labored for a 12 months as a educating assistant at Cornell and, at finest, did a grasp’s thesis.
The “tremendous doctorate” from Wellington would have required an actual PhD, and Joanne believes he did submit one thing, however examiners described it as “unfavourable”.
“He had a really contorted CV, that is for certain,” says Joanne. “He by no means accomplished a sustained piece of labor resulting in a better diploma of the sort that you’d count on a scientist to have.”
Professor Briggs’s title cropped up in Sky Information investigations into Primodos. First in leaked letters from Schering by which scientists have been discussing their issues in regards to the security of the drug.
Learn extra:
Primodos – the secret drug scandal
Evidence could reveal ‘one of the biggest medical frauds of 20th century’
Briggs was UK analysis director for Schering prescription drugs, which made being pregnant check drug Primodos
A paediatrician named Isabel Gal raised the alarm in a paper printed in science journal Nature, warning of a better incidence of spina bifida in infants born to moms who used hormone being pregnant exams.
Briggs then requested a statistician, Dennis Cook dinner, to see if there was a correlation between elevated gross sales of the drug and malformations in UK newborns.
Mr Cook dinner, who later shared his examine with Sky Information, wrote to Briggs warning that the correlation was “alarming”.
But Briggs did not act on this.
He later left Schering, taking on senior roles in universities in Zambia then Australia, however in 1982, when Primodos campaigners tried to sue Schering for damages, Briggs was a key knowledgeable witnesses providing to offer proof on behalf of the corporate.
A PhD thesis from Cornell College and a Physician of Science diploma from Wellington College – each fakes
Joanne says: “The collapse of the trial has been attributed to him by many individuals on the marketing campaign facet. He seemed to be an knowledgeable on a world stage, an incomparable knowledgeable.
“He suggested the World Well being Organisation’s hormone pharmaceutical committee, so that you could not ask for a greater CV, however sadly what was in his CV was largely of his personal making.”
Joanne describes her father’s profession as “a collection of fraudulent acts”.
Within the late Nineteen Eighties he was caught out by Sunday Occasions journalist Brian Deer who discovered Briggs had been fabricating analysis for Schering and one other firm, referring to the security of the contraceptive capsule.
Joanne Briggs says her father’s {qualifications} have been ‘largely of his personal making’
Mr Deer instructed Sky Information: “He was in these days of typewriters, primarily sitting there and considering of what the information should be, and typing it in to tables and sending it off to medical journals to publish.”
Aged 51, Briggs died in mysterious circumstances, shortly after the article was printed. However his legacy wasn’t over.
Sky Information has discovered animal research produced whereas he was UK analysis director at Schering have been amongst dozens of research submitted by the producer to be used in an knowledgeable working group (EWG) report printed in 2017 that examined Primodos for the federal government.
Twenty-eight animal research from the Sixties and 70s have been offered by Schering, and whereas a quantity have been produced within the late 70s after Briggs left the corporate, a few of these have been outsourced and executed in preparation for the litigation by which Briggs was a key witness.
Joanne believes primarily based on the dates and “hallmark traits of his flip of phrase” that among the research have been produced by her father.
“There are analysis papers there that have been really produced by my dad,” she says. “They usually have been relied on by the knowledgeable working group as half and parcel of their conclusion.”
The EWG report has since been utilized by authorities and producers to dismiss more moderen claims by campaigners in regards to the drug’s damaging results.
When requested particularly about one rabbit examine from 1970, the Medicines and Healthcare merchandise Regulatory Company (MHRA), which oversaw the EWG, was in a position to affirm it was not executed by Briggs, however requested us to direct additional questions on Schering’s research to the producer.
It added that the MHRA is “dedicated to reviewing any new scientific knowledge which turns into out there for the reason that conclusion of the Professional Working Group’s evaluation”.
Professor Michael Briggs, pictured together with his household
Schering is now owned by Bayer, which instructed us: “In 2017, the Professional Working Group of the UK’s Fee on Human Medicines concluded that the out there scientific knowledge from a wide range of scientific disciplines doesn’t help a causal relationship between the usage of intercourse hormones in being pregnant and an elevated incidence of congenital anomalies or different hostile outcomes, reminiscent of miscarriage.”
Responding to particular questions on Professor Briggs, they added: “Backed by the appreciable physique of scientific analysis and proof, Bayer maintains that there is no such thing as a causal relationship between use of Primodos and an elevated incidence of congenital anomalies.”
However they haven’t instructed us whether or not research by a serial faker have been or weren’t used to argue that the drug was protected.
Joanne hopes her revelations might result in a rethink in regards to the proof.
“I feel this story a couple of man within the centre of this who occurs to be a fabricated particular person, a hole man, who has been relied on to such an extent for his experience,” she says.
“That does not strike me as irrelevant.”
