Scotland’s well being secretary has assured MSPs that he has “little question” the scandal-hit Queen Elizabeth College Hospital is “secure” after being repeatedly questioned throughout a Holyrood debate.
It comes because the tremendous hospital stays underneath intense scrutiny amid long-running an infection considerations because the Scottish Hospitals Inquiry continues.
In closing submissions earlier in January, NHS Higher Glasgow and Clyde (NHSGGC) admitted, on the stability of chances, that there was a “causal connection between some infections suffered by sufferers and the hospital surroundings, particularly the water system”.
Scottish Labour chief Anas Sarwar tabled a movement in an try and have inquiry chairman Lord Brodie think about the political decision-making of the SNP authorities within the commissioning, building and opening of the Queen Elizabeth College Hospital (QEUH).
The movement additionally requires the rapid full disclosure and preservation of key information held by Scottish authorities in reference to the hospital’s contaminated water, air flow system, the “untimely opening” of the power, and subsequent communications regarding the dealing with of an infection.
The movement will probably be voted on in a while Wednesday, and appears set to be handed.
Scottish Labour chief Anas Sarwar with Kimberly Darroch, mom of Milly Major. Pic: PA
Opening the controversy, Mr Sarwar paid tribute to the three “inspiring and brave” whistleblowers – Dr Teresa Inkster, Dr Penelope Redding and Dr Christine Peters.
He additionally praised the braveness of the households who “refused to remain silent”, together with Kimberly Darroch, whose daughter Milly Major died after contracting an an infection on the flagship hospital.
Mr Sarwar stated: “I need to placed on document that I recognise the extraordinary work that occurs at this hospital each single day, and that many NHS employees go above and past.
“However that have to be true for each affected person and each household, and one failure is one too many.
“However this isn’t merely one failure. That is, with out query, the most important scandal within the historical past of this Scottish parliament.”
After being repeatedly requested by MSPs if the QEUH is at present secure for sufferers, Well being Secretary Neil Grey ultimately stated: “I’ve little question that the hospital is secure.”
The QEUH opened in 2015. On the time, Nicola Sturgeon was first minister, John Swinney was deputy first minister and finance secretary, and Shona Robison was well being secretary.
Scottish Labour have referred to as for Lord Brodie to reopen the inquiry and query the trio.
The social gathering has additionally requested data from the SNP on if any emails, texts, letters, paperwork and different information from this time, together with related WhatsApps and different messages, have been deleted.
Learn extra:
Is this one of the UK’s biggest hospital scandals?
Families call for health board bosses to ‘face a reckoning’
Mr Sarwar stated: “Nicola Sturgeon, John Swinney and Shona Robison haven’t given testimony on the inquiry, and haven’t been cross-examined. With out that, we’ll by no means have the total image of what occurred.
“And there is a additional threat, presiding officer, if political decision-making is just not examined, ministers will try to make use of the ultimate report of the inquiry as proof that the issues have been contained fully throughout the well being board and couldn’t have been prevented by authorities intervention.
“That declare can’t be allowed to face with out correct scrutiny.”
Nicola Sturgeon and Queen Elizabeth throughout the official opening of the QEUH in 2015. Pic: PA
Throughout First Minister’s Questions final week, John Swinney stated his authorities had shared all related proof that addresses the phrases of reference of the inquiry.
Nevertheless, he stated he could be “completely satisfied to launch” additional paperwork if required, “topic to any applicable redactions”.
Well being Secretary Neil Grey. Pic: PA
Responding to the controversy movement, Mr Grey stated instructing the inquiry to research political choices would breach the regulation.
The well being secretary stated he understood the motivation behind Mr Sarwar’s movement, however added: “When one thing goes badly fallacious in a venture of this scale and significance, it’s fully cheap to need each attainable line of accountability examined.
“Nevertheless, whereas I recognise the priority that underpins the movement, I can not assist it as a result of it could be incompatible with the authorized framework that governs this inquiry.
“All statutory public inquiries in Scotland function underneath the Inquiries Act, which was handed by this parliament. That act exists to guard the independence, integrity and credibility of inquiries.
“It offers inquiry chairs highly effective authorized instruments, the facility to compel witnesses, to require the manufacturing of paperwork, to take proof on oath and to find out what proof is related to their phrases of reference.
“These powers are usually not held by ministers, they’re held by the unbiased inquiry chair.
“Any member looking for to assist the movement’s try and affect the motion of the chair is asking for the federal government to behave in a way incompatible with that laws which, in fact, presiding officer, we can not do.”
